IN OCTOBER 2001,
education consultant Marc Prensky coined the terms Digital Native and Digital
Immigrant. Digital Native refers to a person born or brought up during the age
of digital technology, hence familiar with computers and the Internet from an
early age.
Digital Natives spend
“their entire lives surrounded by and using computers, video games, digital
music players, video cams, cell-phones and all other toys and tools of the
digital age”. Growing up with digital gadgets and the sheer volume of their
interactions with these gadgets have changed the way they think and process
information.
On the other hand,
Digital Immigrant refers to a person not born into the digital world but at
some point later on in his/her life picks up digital technology. Just like
other types of immigrants, while some may blend well with the new environment,
most would retain their “accent” or their foot in the past.
In a paper entitled
“Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants”, Prensky discussed the conf lict facing
education in which Digital Immigrant instructors, who speak an outdated
language (that of the pre-digital age), are struggling to teach a population
that speaks an entirely new language.
Now this population of
Digital Natives have entered the workforce and some have become successful
entrepreneurs. In more advanced countries, Digital Natives are slightly older
than in some less developed ones. They are commonly Millennials (born
1982-2002) or Generation Z (born 1996-2009). It has been estimated that
Millennials will form 75% of the workforce by 2030.
Accenture estimated
their spending power in the US alone was US$600 billion (RM2.4 trillion) in
2013 and forecast that it would go up to US$1.4 trillion by 2020.
It is apparent that
the population size and the spending power are significant enough not to be
ignored by the financial services players. In my view, the conflict of Digital
Immigrants and Digital Natives is also happening within the banking and Islamic
banking industry today.
Most of the current
banking products and services as well as the distribution channels were
developed or designed by Digital Immigrants under the constraints of policy and
regulatory compliance requirements prepared by yet another group of Digital
Immigrants.
As a result, Digital
Natives find these products and services less appealing and the distribution
channels not sufficiently customer friendly. Digital Natives tend to fancy the
alternatives provided by fintech companies.
Indeed, fintech
companies offering more convenient and more cost effective alternative digital
financial services are mushrooming.
This phenomenon is
great for consumer empowerment but a threat to traditional financial services
providers. To compete with fintech companies in addressing Digital Native
consumers’ needs and behaviours, traditional banks have to embark on a digital
banking journey.
Digital banking is not
just about having digital distribut ion channels such as online and mobile (app
and web) banking. Digital banking is customer oriented and offers the customer
the service of his/her choice through the access of his/her choice.
It focuses on being
relevant to the customer in his/her daily life through digital outreach but
still recognises the importance of customer engagement via human contact.
A digital bank also
has an innate knowledge of the customer.
A particular customer
may visit a branch, call the contact centre, make a comment through social
media such as Twitter or Facebook, and a digital bank would be aware of all
these accesses and interactions and would respond promptly and consistently.
It would leverage on
the customer’s single view data as a competitive differentiation and will
proactively offer services required by the customer. This “personalised”
service of digital banking appeals to Digital Natives.
Islamic finance
players must have a digital Islamic banking strategy in order to survive.
Digital Islamic
banking is a Shariah-compliant version of digital banking. At the very basic,
digital Islamic banking capabilities need to match the capabilities offered by
conventional counterparts.
This is necessary to
cater for the needs of Muslim Digital Natives.
To further compete
with conventional providers and the fast-growing fintech companies, digital
Islamic banking has to be more innovative. With superior customer experience
innovations, digital Islamic banking could also capture the non-Muslim Digital
Natives market.
In summary, digital
technology has changed customer behaviours.
Digital Natives now
represent a sizeable portion of our workforce population and they have
significant spending power.
Their demand for
digital services drives the needs for digital banking.
For Shariah
compliance, Muslim Digital Natives need digital Islamic banking. It is also
possible for digital Islamic banking to attract the overall Digital Native
market segment with digital services offering superior customer experience.
My
column as appeared in THE MALAYSIAN RESERVE 11 July 2016
The gorgeous post learned a great deal Thanks greatly!
ReplyDeleteFintech executive